Legal Opinion

Belt v. Belt

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1984No. 14299PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Larry and Kristie Belt, Larry’s son Christopher and Belbro, Inc., appeal from a district court judgment dissolving Belbro, Inc. The judgment ordered Belbro’s net assets distributed according to the capital contributions of Larry Belt and his brother LaRue Belt, rather than according to stock ownership, in order to avoid unjust enrichment of Larry. The appellants argue that Idaho law requires distribution of corporate assets according to stock ownership. They contend that unjust enrichment is not applicable here because the parties had an agreement which implicitly covered…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Viehweg v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Smith v. Department of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Meholin v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Quiring v. QuiringIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. DebusMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hyta v. FinleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Anne Marie Beardslee v. Ratliff Family LLC, No. 1; Sherry Mundt, Larry Mundt, James v. Ratliff, Jr., and H. Lorraine RatliffIdaho Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API