Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Pace

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1961No. 19,352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion on Denial of Transfer

Achor, J.

I concur in the denial of transfer in the above captioned case except for the following statement which appears in the Appellate Court opinion, which language, in my opinion, enunciates an erroneous rule of appellate procedure, which purported rule is not necessary to a decision in the case. The statement is as follows:

“Further, said tax returns had relation to only one issue, namely, appellee’s alleged damages. *158Appellant has not briefed or argued the specification of its motion for new trial that the assessed amount of recovery is too large.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. PaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Keck v. PozorskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. PaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API