Lazar v. Riggs
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
Judy Lazar, the plaintiff in the underlying personal injury action, petitioned for exercise of our original jurisdiction, pursuant to C.A.R. 21. She seeks pretrial disclosure of statements made by the defendant, Patrick Riggs, to his insurance company's claims adjusters. The district court denied her motion to compel disclosure, on the grounds that the statements were taken in anticipation of litigation. We issued a rule to show cause, and because the district court's order is not supported by the record, we now make the rule absolute.
I
The lawsuit arises from an automobile accident that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Hawkins v. District Court in & for the Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Sanchez v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goodson v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BrekkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Vinton v. VirziSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Dunn v. American Family InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.