Legal Opinion

Lackey v. Treadwell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1984No. 0188PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

James M. Treadwell, Jr., a Georgia resident, appeals an order denying his motion to quash service of a summons and complaint. The respondent R. Preston Lackey, a South Carolina resident, served the summons and complaint upon Tread-well pursuant to South Carolina’s “long-arm statute.” See S. C. Code of Laws § 36-2-803 (1976). The principal question on appeal is whether traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice prevent the courts of South Carolina from exercis•ing in personam, jurisdiction over Treadwell in this instance.

Lackey seeks to recover retirement benefits…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Compania De Astral, S. A. v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. FIRST-CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Cozi Investments v. SchneiderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ATLANTIC WHOLESALE CO. INC. v. SolondzCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. McKinney v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Lackey v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API