Legal Opinion · Dissent

Collins v. Gee West Seattle LLC

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 21, 2011No. 09-36110Published

1Dissent

CEBULL, Chief U.S. District Judge,

dissenting:

The majority opinion establishes a new bright-line rule that workers who abandon their jobs because the business is closing have not “voluntarily departed” within the meaning of the WARN Act. For the following reasons, I respectfully dissent from the opinion of Judge Smith and the concurrence of Judge Rymer.

If Congress intended that every employee who leaves a job upon notice that the business is closing has “voluntarily departed,” then the WARN Act would say so. In fact, the DOL commentary on the passage of the WARN Act makes clear that a worker…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knappenberger v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Johnson v. TeleSpectrum Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API