Legal Opinion
Russo v. Town of East Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 20, 1979PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiseble, J.
The defendant town of East Hartford condemned a tract of land owned by the plaintiffs and filed a statement of compensation. On appeal to the Superior Court, the matter was referred to a state referee, who, exercising the powers of that court, rendered judgment reassessing damages, from which the plaintiffs have appealed.
The court’s finding is in substance as follows. The plaintiffs purchased 9.489 acres of land in East Hartford on October 18, 1966, for $5000. The lot contained a large man-made hole approximately 35 to 40 feet deep where the plaintiffs, who were in the excavating and land…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Town of Windsor v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Budney v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- West Jefferson Levee D. v. Coast QualitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Barberino Realty & Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- John F. Epina Realty, Inc. v. Space Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Transportation Plaza Associates v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Delfino v. VealencisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.