Morris v. Weddington
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
In this case we are asked to determine whether a witness’s inadvertent statement that the defendant in a personal injury case did not have automobile insurance coverage is sufficient grounds for a mistrial and whether the trial court later acted within its discretion in denying a motion for a new trial.
The facts which gave rise to this controversy are neither complicated nor in dispute. What occurred at trial is somewhat complicated, however, and a proper understanding of those events is essential to the resolution of the issues. Therefore, the pertinent portions of the trial will…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Snowhite v. State, Use of TennantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Jones v. Federal Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Allstate Insurance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Takoma Park Bank v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harford Mutual Insurance v. Woodfin Equities Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Perry v. Asphalt & Concrete Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Landon v. ZornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Renko v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authorty v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.