Legal Opinion

Morris v. Weddington

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 26, 1990No. 53, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

In this case we are asked to determine whether a witness’s inadvertent statement that the defendant in a personal injury case did not have automobile insurance coverage is sufficient grounds for a mistrial and whether the trial court later acted within its discretion in denying a motion for a new trial.

The facts which gave rise to this controversy are neither complicated nor in dispute. What occurred at trial is somewhat complicated, however, and a proper understanding of those events is essential to the resolution of the issues. Therefore, the pertinent portions of the trial will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Snowhite v. State, Use of TennantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Jones v. Federal Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Allstate Insurance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Takoma Park Bank v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harford Mutual Insurance v. Woodfin Equities Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Perry v. Asphalt & Concrete Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Landon v. ZornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Renko v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authorty v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API