Legal Opinion

Chiles v. Conley's Heirs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 15, 1840PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Ejectment. From the Circuit Court for Nicholas County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

In August, 1793, William Hays conveyed, by metes and bounds, to Edward Taylor, one hundred and eighteen and three quarter acres of land, embraced within patents previously issued, but with which Hays had no connection. And in the course of that year, Taylor entered on the land embraced in the deed, and he and those claiming under him, among whom was Conley, and afterwards his heirs, continued in possession until between 1822 and 1825, when Chiles became possessed of some portion of the land, not exceeding one third, by the execution of a writ…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tennis Coal Co. v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Caughlin v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Kentucky Union Company v. HevnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1924
  4. Cummings v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  5. Frasure v. Northern Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API