Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Gerardo R.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
SUMMARY
Principles of due process require that the juvenile court not terminate a presumed father’s parental rights without first finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the father is unfit. Because no such finding was made in this case, and based on our conclusion the court improperly terminated parental rights based on a father’s poverty, we will reverse the order terminating parental rights and remand for reconsideration whether a proper basis for such termination exists, and if not, for renewed efforts aimed at returning the children to their father’s custody. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Cheryl E.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re Gladys L.California Court of Appeal · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alameda County Social Services Agency v. T.B.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Tehama County Department of Social Services v. L.K.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Frank R.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Joseph S.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. C.T. (In re C.A.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.