Legal Opinion

Hamrick v. Hoffman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 6, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1726(RMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Don Hamrick, proceeding pro se, complains that Defendant Crowley Maritime Corporation (“Crowley”) waived the normal requirement that he undergo a preemployment physical examination but that Defendant Dr. Richard S. Hoffman reported to Crowley that Mr. Hamrick had high blood pressure despite the waiver; that Crowley thereafter discharged him as unfit for duty; and that Defendant Seafarers International Union, Atlantic, Gulf, Lakes and Inland Waters District/NMU, AFL-CIO (“Seafarers” or “Union”), failed to represent him properly…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Hamrick v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Todd v. LovecruftDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API