Legal Opinion
Monsanto v. Government of the Virgin Islands
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided September 23, 1985No. Civil No. 511/1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMeyers, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
I
Plaintiff filed this motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that he is entitled to interest due on attorney’s fees awarded by the Government Employees’ Service Commission (GESC). Defendant, on the other hand, has cross-filed for summary judgment and for dismissal of the complaint on the grounds that Plaintiff is not entitled to interest. Based on the relevant statutes and case law pertaining to this issue, the Court agrees with the Defendant and finds that the Plaintiff is not entitled to interest on the award…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Yancey v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Whitelaw v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
- United States v. BedfordDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davis-Richards v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1996