Legal Opinion
Savko v. Port Authority
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 31, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 87-2390PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LEWIS, District Judge.
After hearing evidence and argument during a non-jury trial in the above-captioned case, and after having reviewed and considered the parties’ post-trial submissions, the court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Defendant Port Authority of Allegheny County (“PAT”) is a body corporate and politic organized and existing pursuant to the terms of the Second Class County Port Authority Act, 55 P.S. § 551 et seq. PAT provides public mass transportation in, among other places, Allegheny County,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Griffiths v. Cigna Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994