Legal Opinion
Muretic v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 24, 2007PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Linda Muretic (Claimant) petitions for review from an Order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the Decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting her Reinstatement Petition in part and denying her Review Petition(s). We affirm.
Claimant sustained an injury in the course and scope of her employment on September 23, 1994 after her left foot got caught as she was walking up a flight of stairs. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry (Employer) accepted injuries to her neck, left shoulder, left knee,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Henion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Riley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Mino v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Community Empowerment Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bingnear v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.