United States v. Finn
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Judge:
The appellant was convicted of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and possession of drug abuse paraphernalia. He assigns as error that the military judge did not explain the elements of the object offense of the conspiracy and did not conduct an inquiry into all of the elements of the object offense, thus rendering his guilty pleas improvident.
*697In conducting the providence inquiry, the military judge manifestly did not separately treat the substantive and object offenses involved in the conspiracy charge. He informed the appellant of the elements of conspiracy,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. BeekerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ThornsburyArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004