Legal Opinion

Ray v. Stinson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1985No. 41811PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Justice.

We granted certiorari to consider whether a new trial was required in this case based upon a special jury verdict which awarded an amount in excess of proven special damages and awarded nothing for pain and suffering. Ray v. Stinson, 172 Ga. App. 718 (324 SE2d 506) (1984). In granting the writ, this Court also posed a question to the parties on whether the error, if any, was waived by plaintiffs failure to object to the charge of the court and the form of the verdict. Upon our examination of the record we find that if there is error, the overruling of the motion for new trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Ray v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Foskey v. FoskeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Moody v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Paul Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Turpin v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Johnson v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API