Legal Opinion

Nichizui Trading Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1925No. 125 of 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

This suit was brought against the United States under the Act of March 9, 1920 (U. S. Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, §§ 1251%-125iy4i) as if in rem. The United States, by petition under the fifty-sixth admiralty rule, has attempted to implead the Pacific Mail Steamship Company, and has caused process to be served upon Norton Lilly & Co. as alleged agents for the Pacific Mail Steamship Company at the place of business of the alleged agents in Philadelphia. The Pacific Mail Steamship Company now moves that the service be vacated and set aside, and the cause be dismissed as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. In Re the Louisville UnderwritersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Holland v. Parry Nav. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Andrade v. American Mail Lines, Ltd.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API