Legal Opinion

State v. Planter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1987No. 8726SC95PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motions for a directed verdict on the charge of first-degree burglary. On appeal, he contends the State’s evidence failed to establish he entered the motel room with the intent to commit rape, and thus, as a matter of law, was insufficient to sustain his first-degree burglary conviction.

The evidence presented to support a conviction must be substantial, State v. Smith, 40 N.C. App. 72, 252 S.E. 2d 535 (1979), and “must be sufficient to convince a rational finder of fact of the existence of each essential element [of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API