State v. Planter
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motions for a directed verdict on the charge of first-degree burglary. On appeal, he contends the State’s evidence failed to establish he entered the motel room with the intent to commit rape, and thus, as a matter of law, was insufficient to sustain his first-degree burglary conviction.
The evidence presented to support a conviction must be substantial, State v. Smith, 40 N.C. App. 72, 252 S.E. 2d 535 (1979), and “must be sufficient to convince a rational finder of fact of the existence of each essential element [of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990