Legal Opinion

State v. Canaday

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 13, 1977No. 1 CA-CR 2393PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of grand theft and burglary following a jury trial in the Superior Court. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 14 to 15 years for first degree burglary and 9 to 10 years for grand theft. The sole issue in this appeal is whether his conviction should be reversed because the justice of the peace conducted his preliminary hearing in the absence of counsel.

Appellant’s initial appearance in justice court was on May 11, 1976. Rule 4, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S. There is no transcript of this proceeding in the record. The court minutes…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Adams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bates v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HenryArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. NeeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. People of Michigan v. Gary Patrick LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. McGannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. State v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API