Holt v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
SIMS, Chief Justice.
Eldridge Holt in seeking to reverse a judgment imposing upon him a sentence in the penitentiary for five years for the seduction of. Edith Shaw, a girl under the age of 21 years, under a promise of marriage, assigns three errors,: 1. The verdict is not sustained by the evidence; 2. the court erred in admitting incompetent and in rejecting competent evidence; 3. the instructions are erroneous.
■Appellant was 23 and Edith was 18 years of age at the time of the alleged offense and their homes were about a mile and a half apart in Russell County. Edith’s testimony was that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Duggins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Peyton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Maples v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Catron v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moore v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
- Parsley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Tuttle v. PerryKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
- Barrett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
- Cavins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.