Legal Opinion
In re Matthew F.
New York City Family Court
Decided July 26, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard D. Rosenbloom, J.
This is a juvenile delinquency proceeding in which respondent is alleged to have committed an act, which if done by an adult would constitute the crime of criminal mischief in the fourth degree in violation of section 145.00 of the New York State Penal Law.
Upon motion of the respondent, the court held a preliminary hearing to determine the admissibility of an inculpatory statement made by respondent. (People v Huntley, 15 NY2d 72.) The principal argument advanced by respondent’s law guardian was that the statement was not taken in a facility designated by the appropriate Appellate Division of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- In re Gregory W.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- In re Aaron D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- In re Kenneth C.New York City Family Court · 1984
- People v. Martin W.New York City Family Court · 1980
- In re Raquan W.New York City Family Court · 2017