Legal Opinion

Cleveland Wrecking Co. v. Struck Const. Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 15, 1941No. 212PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

This action was brought by the plaintiff Cleveland Wrecking Company to recover from the defendants Struck Construction Company and City of Louisville Municipal Housing Commission the sum of $6,762.71 with interest, being the damage suffered by reason of being deprived through acts of the defendants of certain fixtures and equipment which the plaintiff claims it was entitled to as salvage from a demolition job undertaken by it. A jury trial was waived by the parties.

Findings of Fact

The plaintiff Cleveland Wrecking Company (hereinafter referred to as Wrecking Company) is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Board of Park Commissioner v. PrinzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Twyman's Admr. v. Board of CouncilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  5. City of Paducah v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. City of Elizabethtown v. CaswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  3. Clark v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1999
  4. Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Joseph v. Farnsworth Radio & Television Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API