Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 14, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0838PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge

The District of Columbia’s Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is authorized by-statute to. let arrestees “post and forfeit” an amount of money to speedily and finally resolve certain low-level criminal charges. Plaintiffs are four individuals who chose to resolve their charges in this manner but think that the post-and-forfeit procedure is unlawful in various ways. The challenges they raise, ■ however, have already been roundly rejected in this Circuit, and with good reason. The Court will therefore dismiss their complaint in its…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Patrick Kincaid v. Government of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API