Shay v. McNamara
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for defendants in the Nineteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Wheeler, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 1, Ross, J.:
Thomas C. and J ohanna J ohnson were married October 24th, 1858. On the 10th of January, 1866, the lot of land in con*172troversy was conveyed to Thomas—the consideration therefor being paid out of their common property. On the next day Johnson and wife united in the execution of a mortgage on the lot to the California Building and Loan Society, to secure the payment of a certain sum of money. The money not having been paid, an action was afterward commenced in the Twelfth District Court to foreclose the mortgage, to which action Johnson and wife were made parties…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Campbell v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ludy v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Shiels v. NathanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Seymour v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Midland Realty Co. v. HalversonMontana Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.