Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Wallace

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Bill by William B. Seymour, administrator of the estate of Frances E. Wallace, deceased, against Jacob L. Wallace and Betsy Gates, to set aside certain deeds, and to subject the property conveyed to the payment of claims against the estate. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Frances E. Wallace, being the owner of the premises in question, made a deed of the same to her brother, Jacob L. Wallace, on November 7, 1895. This deed recited that it was made “ in consideration of the sum of maintenance, expenses of sickness and funeral, and debts; when paid, this deed to be delivered; to be in hand paid by the party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged.” It provided, further, that “the grantor reserves the use of said property her lifetime,” etc.; and it concluded with full covenants of warranty. The deed was left in the hands of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brigham v. FayerweatherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Campbell v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Rinchey v. . StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  4. Inman v. MeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Cook v. HopperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cox v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Savage v. North Anson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  3. State Bank of Sevier v. American Cement & Plaster Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Huard v. PionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  5. Schuler v. FordIdaho Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API