Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. TAC Technical Services, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 14, 2000No. 98-P-343PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.
Claiming that his employment was terminated on account of his age (count I) and that the termination was in violation of public policy and therefore wrongful (count II), the *91plaintiff brought this action against his employer, TAC Technical Services, Inc. (TAC); Polaroid Corporation (Polaroid), his workplace; and David Chenard, his supervisor at Polaroid.2 A judge of the Superior Court allowed the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We affirm.
We state the material facts, as developed in the plaintiff’s deposition and his two affidavits, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Wright v. Shriners Hospital for Crippled ChildrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Abramian v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Knight v. Avon Products, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Lawson v. FMR LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Holyoke Medical Center, Inc. v. GeorgeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Zaniboni v. Massachusetts Trial CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Natal v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.