Legal Opinion

Daughtry v. . Daughtry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1945PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

It is alleged in the complaint and admitted in the answer that plaintiff and defendant were married in 1912, and lived together as husband and wife until May, 1942. Therefore, the contract under consideration was executed after separation and provides for the support of the defendant and their minor daughter. The contract also determines the rights of the respective parties thereto as to the use and occupancy of certain properties and the income therefrom.

The appellant insists that this agreement is not such a contract between husband and wife as to require the separate examination of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Kiger v. KigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Mansour v. RabilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Bolin v. BolinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API