Legal Opinion

United Security Life Insurance Company v. Clark

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1959No. 6 Div. 667PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

This action was brought by the appellee, wife of the insured, upon a policy of insurance which obligates the Company to pay the beneficiary One Thousand Dollars, “If the insured sustains * * * bodily injury effected solely through violent, external and accidental means * *

Among the conditions of the policy, upon which it issued, are the following:

“This policy does not cover death caused
“(1) from homicide or self destruction, while sane or insane.
“(2) from participation in an assault or felony.”

The pleading was in short by consent the general issue, with leave to give in evidence…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Kurn v. CountsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. O'Bar v. Southern Life Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Union Central Life Insurance Company v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Lewis v. MossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Taylor v. Insurance Company of North AmericaMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Gradco Corp v. Blankenship (In Re Blankenship)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API