Legal Opinion

Fourth National Bank v. Mayer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 30, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Actiom on bond. Before Judge Spence. Dougherty superior court. April term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

It was error to nonsuit the plaintiff in an action upon an attachment bond, on the ground that the surety upon that bond had not been sued with the principal. The question whether or not the surety ought to have been sued could not properly be thus raised; but even were it otherwise, the proposition that suing the surety was essential is without merit. It could be of no possible benefit to a principal in any case to have his surety adjudged jointly liable with him upon the cause of action, because the ultimate liability must in any event fall upon the principal alone. Judgment reversed.

W. T.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fourth National Bank v. MayerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Fourth National Bank v. MayerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Booher v. WorrillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Florida, Central & Peninsular Railroad v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Morrison v. SlatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Dawson Paper Shell Pecan Co. v. Montezuma Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Cone v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Jaksich v. GuistiNevada Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API