Krasilnikoff v. Dundon
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mullany, Grant & Cushing, Cushing, Grant & Cushing, and Garret W. McEnerney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Appeal by defendant from judgment against him and from order denying his motion for a new trial.
Appellant takes the position that the action is one for damages for breach of warranty as to the efficiency of two certain boilers manufactured by defendant for plaintiff. He concedes that the evidence sustains the finding of the court that there was a breach of such warranty, but insists that the evidence does not sustain the finding as to the amount of the damages. The boilers were constructed at San Francisco, under a contract which required them to he delivered at the wharf in San Francisco,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Coburn v. GoodallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Shearer v. Park Nursery Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barrios v. Pacific States Trading Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Porter v. GestriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916