Goulet v. OfficeMax, Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This case came before the Supreme Court on December 2, 2003, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown. Accordingly, we shall decide the appeal at this time.
The plaintiff, Carol Goulet (plaintiff), appeals pro se from the dismissal of her personal injury complaint against the defendant, OfficeMax, Inc. (OfficeMax or defendant), due to plaintiffs failure to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Senn v. Surgidev Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Bosler v. SugarmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- Mumford v. LewissSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Providence Gas Company v. Biltmore Hotel Operating Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Limoges v. Eats RestaurantSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Malinou v. Miriam HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Flanagan v. BlairSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Aguayo v. D'AMICOSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- Ahmed v. ST. JOSEPHS HEALTH SERVICES OF RHODE ISLANDSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Berrios v. Jevic TransportationSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.