Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Young v. Buskirk

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1868PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Application for leave to file an information in the nature of a quo warranto.

1Opinion of the CourtFagg, Judge

The petition of the relator being filed, and the respondent having appeared in obedience to process from this court and made answer to the same, we are asked to consider the case upon a demurrer to the sufficiency of the facts set up in the answer. But it is manifest that another question arises upon the face of the papers that must be first considered and disposed of. The petition proceeds in the name of the State, by Robert F. Wingate, attorney-general, and upon the relation of Samuel M. Youngi It is not an ex-officio information on the part of the attorney-general, which, in all cases…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McIlhany v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  2. State ex rel. Hequembourg v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunter v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. STATE EX INF. DANFORTH v. MerrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Lloyd v. ElliottUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. ClaggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  5. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. BalcomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API