Legal Opinion

STATE EX INF. DANFORTH v. Merrell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 25, 1975No. 59075PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENLEY, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in quo war-ranto by the State on the information of the Attorney General (informant). The primary question presented is whether respondents have authority to change, alter or amend the purpose for which money appropriated by the general assembly may be used. We hold they do not.

The background out of which this case arose is as follows. In August, 1972, the people adopted an amendment of Article IV of the constitution of Missouri, providing,1 in general, for the reorganization of the executive department of state government into not more than 14…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Danforth v. State Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. State Board of Mediation v. PiggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Three Rivers Junior College District of Poplar Bluff v. StatlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. State ex inf. Walker v. Equitable Loan & Investment Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. State Ex Rel. McAllister v. Cupples Station Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Americans United v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Mathewson v. Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. MC Development Co. v. Central R-3 School District of St. Francois CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. State ex inf. Graham ex rel. Mississippi County ex rel. Bishop v. HurleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API