Legal Opinion

San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Mark D.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1993No. D018691Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, Acting P. J.

Mark D. (Mark), a resident of Pennsylvania and the father of Joseph D. (Joseph), appeals a judgment under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 declaring Joseph a dependent of San Diego County *681Juvenile Court. Mark, who had been awarded custody of Joseph in an earlier proceeding in family court in Pennsylvania, contends the San Diego proceeding violated the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (Uniform Act).1 Mark also contends the case should have been transferred to Pennsylvania under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Additionally, Mark assigns error to (1)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kumar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Fry v. BallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. In Re Interest of LWNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-78632Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Nelson v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API