Legal Opinion
Volvo Construction Equipment North America, Inc. v. CLM Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 8, 2004No. 03-1108PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER joined, Judge WIDENER wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
KING, Circuit Judge:
Three retail dealers of large earth-moving motor graders (the “Dealers”)1 appeal the district court’s decision in favor of the graders’ manufacturers (collectively, “Volvo”)2 in this contract dispute. Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. CLM Equip. Co., Inc., 236 F. Supp.2d 536 (W.D.N.C.2002) (the “Opinion”). The Dealers maintain that the court lacked…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Premier Payments Online, Inc. v. Payment Systems WorldwideDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Volvo Construction Equipment North America, Inc. v. Clm Equipment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMSDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Zhejiang Hailiang Co. Ltd. v. KME Germany GmbHDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024