Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Struthers

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 13, 1889No. 234PublishedCited by 16 opinions

error to the circuit court oe the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. This was an action of assumpsit, brought in the court below by J. Pierpont Morgan, a citizen of .the State of New York, against Thomas Struthers and one Thomas S. Blair, citizens of Pennsylvania, to recover the sum of $26,282.19, with interest, on a certain contract in writing, more particularly described hereafter.

Read the full summary

error to the circuit court oe the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. This was an action of assumpsit, brought in the court below by J. Pierpont Morgan, a citizen of .the State of New York, against Thomas Struthers and one Thomas S. Blair, citizens of Pennsylvania, to recover the sum of $26,282.19, with interest, on a certain contract in writing, more particularly described hereafter. The defendant Blair not having been served with process the case proceeded against Struthers alone. The material facts in the case were substantially as follows: In the year 1873, Thomas…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamar

Several exceptions were taken during the progress of the trial,- to-the rulings of the court in excluding evidence offered by the plaintiff, to its refusal to give instructions requested by thfe plaintiff, and to its general charge to the jury, which are embodied in twelve assignments of error. It is not necessary to discuss them seriatim, as the main contention relates to the correctness of the instructions given by the Circuit Court to the jury. In order to determine the principle on which the instructions rest, it will be useful to ascertain the points incidentally connected with the case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burke v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Quiner v. Marblehead Social InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. White v. . KuntzNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Meyer v. . BlairNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Harvey v. Linville Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Steele v. Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Security Life Accident Ins. Co. v. CarlovitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API