Legal Opinion

United States v. Fred M. Mosely

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1987No. 85-3898PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Mosely appeals from a jury conviction on a six-count indictment charging violations of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1982). Mosely asserts that three errors of the district court require reversal of his conviction. These alleged errors involve the method of exercising peremptory challenges employed by the court, the district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to act as co-counsel in his own defense under a hybrid representation theory, and comments on the testimony made by the district judge to the jury. As more fully set forth below, we find…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. United States v. Sean Lamont CromerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ralph Stephens Baze, Jr. v. Philip Parker, Warden, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API