Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Guerrero
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided June 18, 1991No. 13-90-490-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
Appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus alleging that an indictment pending against her was based on a constitutionally invalid statute. 1 The trial court denied relief. We affirm the trial court’s order.
Appellant was indicted under the Controlled Substances Act for the offense of illegal investment, Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.126 (Vernon Pamph. 1991). 2 The indictment, coincident with the elements of the offense set out by § 481.-126, alleged that appellant did intentionally and knowingly finance and invest funds, to wit, United States…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Cotton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Engelking v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Ex Parte MattoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Tanner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- City of El Paso v. Alvarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- Ex parte LunaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.