Legal Opinion

DUCHARME, MCMILLEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Calgon Carbon Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 2003No. Civil Action 00-1730Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LANCASTER, District Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs motion to preclude the testimony of Eddie Beck as Defendant’s expert on three separate issues regarding Mississippi state tax law. Plaintiff asserts that Mr. Beck’s testimony should be precluded because it does not meet the relevancy and reliability requirements set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and its progeny. Plaintiff also moves for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. STATE TAX COM'N v. Chevron USA, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API