Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Havana State Bank v. Rodes

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 14, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The answer to the rule in contempt in this case sets up an honest and bona fide attempt on the part of respondents to comply with the commands of the peremptory writ of mandamus, therefore the return is held sufficient, the exceptions to same overruled and the rule in contempt discharged, without prejudice to the right of relator to seek other and further relief to collect what is its due.

In mandamus cases a certificate of compliance with the commands of a peremptory writ of mandamus stating detailed particulars of compliance, should be filed by respondents within the time fixed by the court.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. KnottSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Warren v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. State, Ex Rel. Neafie v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. State, Ex Rel. Neafie v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API