Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Knott
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 2, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Travelers Indemnity Company proposed to issue a policy of indemnity insurance containing the coverage clauses known as clauses A and B, in the following language:
(A) "To pay on behalf of the assured all sums which the assured shall become obligated to pay by reason of the liability imposed upon him by law for damages because of bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom, accidentally sustained by any person or persons and caused by the ownership, maintenance or use of the automobile; and
(B) "To pay on behalf of the assured all sums which the assured shall become…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Employers' Liability Insurance v. FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Anoka Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Fenton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Stephens v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Knott, as TreasurerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Members Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hermann HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Paz R. Hernandez v. The Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Lee A. Everhart v. Drake Management, Inc., Union Commerce, Defendant-Third Party v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Vines v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. WilkersonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.