Legal Opinion

Travis v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 25, 1957No. 18138PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Plaintiff in error, herein referred to as Travis, seeks reversal of a judgment discharging a writ of habeas corpus issued by the district court on his petition which alleged: that he, Travis, “has been illegally arrested and confined” and “has not been charged with any crime or other offense and all proceedings in this matter are void and without legal effect.” The arrest was made upon an extradition warrant from the state of Kansas.

It appears from the record that Travis was convicted of “second degree forgery” in the state of Kansas and served a few months over four years for this offense.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stallings v. SplainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. State Ex Rel. Treseder v. RemannWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Self v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. People Ex Rel. MacK v. MeyeringIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Loper v. Dees, SheriffMississippi Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Applications of OppenheimerArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Luker v. KochSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. Dilworth v. LeachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Dressel v. BiancoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. IerardiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API