Legal Opinion

Waaldijk-Howell v. Howell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 17, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated July 9, 2004, which, after a hearing, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding upon finding that the petitioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent committed acts constituting a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Board of Education of Ramapo Central School District v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Harris v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Howell v. HowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Howell v. HowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API