Legal Opinion
Weigmann v. Glorious Food, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 1996No. 95 Civ. 8712 (DC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this Title VII action, plaintiffs allege that defendant catering company discriminated, and continues to discriminate, against its female “cater waiters” by limiting their hours and wages and by not assigning them certain work at private parties. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendant’s allegedly discriminatory policies and to recover back pay and compensatory and punitive damages. Plaintiffs now move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 for an order certifying this action as a class action.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A. Summary of Facts
Plaintiffs Jessica Weigmann…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- People United for Children, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Osdoby v. Handi-foil Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023