Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 31, 1947No. 2918PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

Judgment is about to be entered for $42,480.81 under the Renegotiation Act, SO U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191.

A question about interest has arisen. Defendants have been holding the sum involved in Government bonds, pending the outcome of a series of hearings and arguments in the court on this and like cases. The Government is claiming interest at 6 per cent from the date of determination.

The Renegotiation Acts have not provided for interest, but a regulation of the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board has been cited as follows:

“(3) Interest at the rate of 6 per cent per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Strontium Products Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1946
  4. Porter v. FleishmanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  2. United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. Sandnes' Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. E. F. Drew & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  5. United States v. HopkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API