Legal Opinion · Dissent

Corbett v. Curtis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 4, 1967Published

1DissentDufresne, Justice

The factual setting for the accident in which the plaintiff wife received her injuries need not be restated. Let us however retouch the painted scene so that certain significant existing physical conditions may show, which do not appear in the running account of the majority opinion. The automobile in which the plaintiff wife was riding made a right side exit into the low-level waters of the Little Androscoggin River from “an old wooden bridge sufficient in width to accommodate an automobile.” Said bridge was further described by a state police officer as having a top longitudinal plank…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bollenbach v. BloomenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Krohmer v. DahlMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Parlow v. Dan Hamm Drayage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API