Legal Opinion

In re Kimball Hill, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 3, 2019No. Case No. 08bk10095PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMOTHY A. BARNES, Judge.

This matter comes on for continued consideration on the Purchaser's Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Enforcing Confirmation Order; (II) Directing Dismissal of State Court Claims; (III) Awarding Damages; and (IV) Granting Related Relief [Dkt. No. 3969] (the "Motion") brought by TRG Venture Two, LLC ("TRG"), the successor owner of assets from the above-captioned bankruptcy cases. The Motion is opposed by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland ("F & D"), a surety on projects relating to those assets and a creditor of the bankruptcy estate.

The court has previously found…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Backus Electric, Inc. v. HubbarttUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. TRG Venture Two LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  3. In re Kimball Hill, Inc., et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Kimball Hill, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Richard A Hazelton and Kelly J HazeltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API