Legal Opinion

Elenza, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories Holding Corporation

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 20, 2018No. 287, 2017PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEITZ, Justice:

Replacement lenses used to treat eye cataracts have a limitation-the new lenses focus only at one distance. In most cases, reading glasses are still required after surgery. Elenza, Inc. thought it had a solution to the problem-an electro-active intraocular lens ("EAIOL") that used electric power and changes in eye pupil size to "trigger" the focus of an artificial lens. If it worked, patients could see clearly at multiple distances without glasses.

Alcon Laboratories Holding Corporation, a developer of artificial lenses, was also exploring EAIOL lenses. Elenza and Alcon decided…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Othentec Ltd. v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Greenberg v. Croydon Plastics Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Smith v. Delaware State UniversitySupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. Salsbury Laboratories, Inc. v. Merieux Laboratories, Inc., Donald G. Hildebrand, Jack R. BergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Trident Products & Services, LLC v. Canadian Soiless Wholesale, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. NuVasive, Inc. v. DayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  2. Anthium, LLC v. SheltonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
  3. Arxada Holdings NA Inc. v. HarveyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026
  4. BHP Partners CO., LP, e al. v. Chandler KeelCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026
  5. DAT Solutions, LLC v. Convoy, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API