Legal Opinion

United States v. Cale

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 4, 1981No. 80 CR. 820(MP)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILTON POLLACK, District Judge.

In an omnibus motion, defendants challenge the legitimacy and seek to suppress the fruits of court-ordered electronic surveillance and wire taps and of the search warrants issued subsequently and based, in part, on information obtained through the electronic surveillance and wire tap interception. Motions are also presented to dismiss the racketeering count, to hold a minimization hearing, to suppress the statement given by defendant, Andrew Stambuk, to sever from the trial the charges against defendants Sovulj and Caron, to dismiss the charges against…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Franjo Ivic, Nedjelko Sovulj, Ivan Cale and Stipe Ivkosic, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. SantoroDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  3. Stamos v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  4. United States v. GellerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. United States v. LillaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API