Hetherington v. Camp Bird Mining, Leasing & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action to recover for electric service and power. Judgment for defendant. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court' of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Henry J. Herscy, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller
Tpie plaintiff in error brought suit against the defendant in error, The Camp Bird Company, to recover for electric service and power furnished to said defendant from a power plant, of which the plaintiff was the owner.
The trial court rendered judgment for defendant, upon the opening statement of plaintiff’s attorney. The plaintiff brings the cause here for review, and asks for a supersedeas.
The statement in question included the following: that The Brant Independent Mining Company was the owner of mining lands on which it had given a deed of trust to secure the payment of certain bonds; that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- People Ex Rel. Brush Electric Manufacturing Co. v. WempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Terrace Water Co. v. San Antonio Light & Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
- Commonwealth ex rel. McCormick v. Keystone Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
3Cited by9 opinions
- Minnesota Power & L. Co. v. Personal Prop. Tax, Etc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Curry v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Department of Revenue v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Winterfield v. Hardin County Rural Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- State ex rel. Spillman v. Interstate Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.