Legal Opinion
Martin v. Fulton County
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 14, 1958No. 19905PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. While no procedural questions have been raised in the present case by counsel representing the parties, our study of the case has indicated a need for clarification of procedural matters pertaining to the statutory proceeding codified as Chapter 36-11 of the Code, under which the power of eminent domain may be exercised. These questions are, whether or not there may be direct exceptions to the overruling of a general demurrer in a condemnation proceeding brought under Chapter 36-11; and whether questions as to the sufficiency of the pleadings and the right to condemn may be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Piedmont Cotton Mills v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Atlanta Terra Cotta Co. v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Rogers v. Toccoa Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Marist Society of Georgia v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- State Highway Department v. H. G. Hastings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Woodside v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- City of Carrollton v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Johnson v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Mitchell v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- State Highway Department v. McCurdySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.